beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On May 6, 2015, the Defendant was investigated as criminal facts that assaulted the victims during the process of preventing the victims E and F from purchasing drinking water at D stores located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and attempted to flee without paying the consideration, from purchasing drinking water at D stores located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. The Defendant was investigated as criminal facts.
7. 28. The victims were not subject to punishment and have the record of disposition that they were not subject to prosecution.
A. On May 11, 2015, the Defendant found the above victim E who was working at the above D store on May 11, 2015, along with the name infinite (a disposition of suspending indictment on the same day) on the part of May 11, 2015, and discovered the victim E who was working at the above D store. For the purpose of retaliationing the victim’s unfavorable statement against the Defendant in the above assault case, the Defendant appears to have shown that he was finite outside the above store, and that he would inflict harm on the life, body, etc. of the female, etc., and the above name infinites would be punished by reporting to the police who did not have committed the crime.
In this respect:
(1) The term “Mara, Ma, Ma, Ma,” supra.
As a result, in collusion with the above-mentioned person, the defendant threatened the victim E for the purpose of providing the proviso of investigation, such as filing a criminal complaint or accusation in connection with his/her criminal case investigation or trial.
B. The facts charged as of May 14, 2015 are as follows: around 19:00 on the 14th of the same month, the Defendant, who violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and interfered with the business, did not discover that the Defendant returned the victim E and F to the above D store operated by the victim G on the 19:00 of the same month. As such, in the above assault case, the victims reported to the police that there was no crime against the Defendant, thereby imposing a fine.