A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

An application for compensation by an applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

On June 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and six months for special robbery at the Seoul High Court, and on February 6, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two months of imprisonment for a crime of violating the Military Service Act at the Suwon Branch, which became final and conclusive on June 24, 2015, and the sentence of the suspended sentence was invalidated on June 24, 2015. In Seoul Southern Branch, the Defendant was released on May 30, 2017 and the parole period expired on July 5, 2017.

The Defendant, “2018 Highest 3724, the 2018 Highest 3724, the Defendant, at around June 2017, became to communicate with each other through D around the same day between the victim B and the middle school, thereby developing into an annual relationship. On June 14, 2017, the Defendant, “a money is necessary to rent the lending business company,” to the said victim.

The phrase “to repay as soon as possible as possible as he/she borrowed money.”

However, the defendant did not have a plan to borrow a lending business company, and even if he borrowed the above money from the injured party, he did not have an intention or ability to repay the money.

The Defendant received KRW 1,00,000,000 from the above victim’s account (Account Number:F) in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and received KRW 20,370,000 in total from around that time to February 3, 2018 as shown in the list of crimes.

Accordingly, the Defendant was given property by deceiving the victim as above.

The defendant and the victim G were in the relationship between August 2017 and September 2017.

On August 26, 2017, the Defendant is entitled to receive money from the victim under the Section I of the H building I in Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, to obtain a loan from the victim.

First of all, a false statement was made to the effect that the lending of money to B is to be made one week after the loan was made in the name of aner.

However, in fact, the defendant was thought to use money for personal purposes, such as living expenses, from the injured party, and there was no intention to engage in loan business.