1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are identical to the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted to the court of first instance (the plaintiff submitted the evidence No. 7-1 to No. 3 in this court, and each of the above evidence submitted to the court of first instance is a part of No. 6-1 to No. 3, which is a detailed statement of deposit transaction submitted to the court of first instance), it is acknowledged that the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are legitimate

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the addition as follows, and thus, it is citing it as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

2. The following shall be added to Section 5 of Section 4 of the first instance judgment on the part added:

In addition, the Plaintiff joined the Defendant C even after April 25, 2009 to June 201, 201, which had been operated by the Plaintiff after the 13th day of the instant case, and the said 25th day of the instant 13th day of the Plaintiff, received KRW 10 million from the Defendant C through eight times from April 25, 2009 beginning with the said 25th day of the instant 13th day of the Plaintiff, and on the other hand, the remainder of KRW 1,687,00,000,000, excluding the amount paid by the Defendant B from February 13, 2008 beginning with the said 13th day of the instant 13th day of the day of the Plaintiff, was deposited as the amount paid by the Defendant C or D.

(See) The Plaintiff’s aforementioned assertion is based on the details of deposits in the briefs dated June 15, 2018 and the briefs dated April 19, 2019). Ultimately, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff paid the entire amount of deposits in the 13th class of the instant documents among the 13th class of the instant documents, inasmuch as the amount exceeding KRW 20 million was repaid and appropriated for the payment obligation of the said accounts, it is reasonable to deem that the payment of deposits in the 2nd class of the instant documents among the 13th class of the instant documents being sought by the Plaintiff in the instant case.

[.] ".."

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.