logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2012.11.15 2012고단2084
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a driver of a small passenger car B.

On July 14, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on July 14, 2012, and led to a private distance without signal lights from 1117-7, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, to an acceptance-free plane from the water protection area of the Pyang-gu.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to check whether the motor vehicle is to enter the intersection and temporarily stop the front side and check whether the motor vehicle is to enter the intersection.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected such duty and caused the collision of the part on the right side of the victim C (the 19-year-old driver) driving into the intersection from the left side of the running direction of the defendant.

The Defendant, by the foregoing negligence, sustained injury by the need for medical treatment of the victim for about two weeks, and at the same time, escaped from the site without taking necessary measures, such as providing rescue to the victim, even though the damaged lebane was damaged by 50,000 won, while leaving the site.

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant's partial statement in the suspect examination protocol against the defendant, and C's statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. C’s statement;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Determination as to the defendant's assertion in a written estimate

1. The Defendant asserts that the instant accident did not cause injury to the victim, and that, immediately after the instant accident, the Defendant stopped and proposed to leave the hospital to the victim, but the victim did not refuse to take relief measures as the victim did not have any other place.

2. According to each evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the victim suffered injury, such as salt pane, etc. requiring treatment for about two weeks due to the instant accident, and received hospitalized treatment at a hospital, and the defendant was able to ask the victim who was landed from the vehicle immediately after the instant accident, to see whether he was fine.

arrow