1. The Defendant shall deliver to the Plaintiff a house of 26 square meters in the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Babro Babro, a house with 36 square meters.

2...

According to the reasoning of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), and the fact-finding reply to the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office, Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office, the land of Dongdaemun-gu has a size of 26 square meters on the land without permission (hereinafter referred to as "the housing of this case"), and the plaintiff has paid compensation for State property. The plaintiff and the defendant were to have reached the lease contract (hereinafter referred to as "the lease contract of this case") with the above 30,000 won per month on or before June 2014 (the above lease contract of this case was reduced to 280,000 won), and on the ground that the defendant resided in the housing of this case, the defendant transferred the housing of this case to the plaintiff for 20,000 won per annum, 2015, 2015, 10, 2016, 218, 217, 2017).

According to the above facts, since the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated pursuant to Article 640 of the Civil Act by the plaintiff's notification of termination of the lease contract on the ground of rent delay for more than two years, the defendant is obligated to deliver the house of this case to the plaintiff.

As to this, the defendant alleged to the effect that the defendant did not delay the payment of two or more vehicles at the time of the plaintiff's notice of termination of the lease contract. However, as seen earlier, the defendant's delay in payment reaches two or more vehicles at the time of the plaintiff's notice of termination of the lease contract, and the reference materials submitted by the defendant after the closing of argument in the