Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the defendant shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revocation shall be dismissed.

The instant case’s summary of the sales contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Plaintiff (the buyer/Buyer/B) and B (the seller/B), and the Defendant (the trust and fund management agent/fixed company”) concluded two times on October 6, 2014 and June 2015, the sales contract for the following main contents (hereinafter “instant officetel”) with respect to the instant instant officetel Etel (hereinafter “instant officetel”). The instant officetel was not completed until the date of the closing of argument in the first instance trial (the Plaintiff extended the maturity of existing intermediate payment on September 28, 2017, and the Plaintiff did not agree to the proposal of B(B) and the construction agent’s consent on February 28, 2019, and the Plaintiff did not comply with the purport of Section 8). However, the Plaintiff’s consent to the completion of construction of the instant officetel at the first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s first instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second instance court’s second hearing’s second hearing’s second hearing’s second hearing’s closing.

(4) In cases where the occupancy has been delayed for more than six months from the initial scheduled date for occupancy due to a cause attributable to A, or where A has received a corrective order under Article 9 of the Act on the Sale of Building Units from the permitting authority, the contract may be rescinded by June 2017 (the scheduled date for completion may be modified by the process, and the date for completion shall be later notified individually), and Article 7 (Cancellation of the contract) (3) of the scheduled date for completion of 120,100 won:

(5) A.