logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.04.22 2013가단29065
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff asserts that, with the knowledge that the Plaintiff’s father purchased the instant real estate from the deceased G, the Plaintiff inherited the instant real estate from the Plaintiff’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her own with his her her her her her her her her her her her her own intention

Whether the Plaintiff possessed the instant real estate or not is not sufficient to recognize the evidence of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5, on the sole basis of whether the Plaintiff possessed the instant real estate, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(In full view of the result of the on-site inspection by the court, most of the current state of the instant real estate is recognized as forest and field. Therefore, the claim for the completion of the prescriptive acquisition premised on the Plaintiff’s possession of the instant real estate is without merit without any further review.

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow