logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2014.10.17 2014고정97
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person engaged in driving a gallon car.

At around 18:50 on February 19, 2014, the Defendant driven the said car and proceeded from the boundary line to the front line of the Gongju University with the distance from the Gongju University, which is located in the new line at the time of the official city.

In this case, the driver has a duty of care to live well on the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care to safely prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to turn to the right while driving a vehicle to the left at a great degree, and received the back portion of the victim C's D's car, which was going to the left at two-lanes of the same direction as the driver's car, in front of the right side of the driver's car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, immediately stopped the car owned by the victim so that the amount equivalent to approximately KRW 4,117,718 of the estimated cost is damaged and escaped without taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of traffic accident-related person;

1. 교통사고발생보고서, 교통사고보고⑴⑵(실황조사서)

1. On-site photographs, motion picture images of damaged vehicles, video materials in front and rear of the accident scene photographs, and photographs of the accident vehicle;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “the Criminal Procedure Act”) of the provisional payment order, the Defendant had voluntarily left the left and escaped without taking any measures to cause a traffic accident.

Accordingly, the victim of the instant accident seems to have not been compensated for the considerable period of time.

Therefore, criminal punishment against the defendant is inevitable.

In the above circumstances, the defendant committed the crime of this case against this Court.

arrow