logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.04.21 2014가합58715
정산금지급청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties concerned are the owners of each household of the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government apartment building A (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) and the defendant fluorium (hereinafter “Defendant fluorium”) is the executor of the apartment of this case, and the defendant fluorium construction (hereinafter “Defendant fluorium construction”) is the starting construction of the apartment of this case.

B. The announcement of the recruitment of the apartment of this case, such as the announcement of the recruitment of the apartment of this case, was made on September 30, 2008. The share of the housing site for each household in the announcement of the recruitment of the apartment of this case was recorded in the following table, and the share of the housing site was recorded in the sales contract for the apartment of this case

Housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing-type housing ownership 85.811A 51.122 86.2063 51.0642 85.81B 51.22 84.2193 51.0757

C. The registration, etc. of the instant apartment was completed in around 201, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on August 18, 201 with respect to the instant apartment, and the registration of ownership transfer was completed on August 18, 201 with respect to the instant apartment on the basis of the sale contract between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant Fluorium. 2) Defendant Fluorium conducted the procedures for the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the instant apartment. Since the total area of the instant apartment site and the total area of the site area according to the ownership ratio, namely, the division of the site ratio and the molecular, were in conflict with each other, the following [Attachment] after November 13, 2013 (hereinafter “actual share of the instant apartment site”), each of the instant apartment site shares in each household (hereinafter “the shares in each of the instant apartment site”) was reduced compared to the shares in each of the instant housing site in the sale contract (hereinafter “the shares in each of the instant housing site”).

- [Attachment]

arrow