Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in a third-party corporation taxi driver service.

At around 10:40 on November 1, 2013, the Defendant proceeded two lanes of the two-lanes of the narrow-lanes of the narrow-lanes of the Yandong East-gu, Ansan-si, Ansan-si from the shooting distance bank in the west-gu.

When a person engaged in driving service intends to change course, he/she shall not change course when it is likely to impede normal traffic of other vehicles running in the direction to which he/she intends to change course, and when he/she intends to change the course, he/she has a duty of care to give an advance notice of change of course by operating direction, etc. and to change the vehicle line by taking into account the traffic situation at right and right

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim to go beyond the road by the collision with the unregistered scooter driving by the victim D (Scoo) who was driving in direct direction one lane in the same direction by negligence that the defendant tried to go to the U.S. while moving to the U.S. line.

At the same time, the Defendant, by negligence in the above business, sustained injury to the victim D, such as saves and salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time, destroyed the property equivalent to KRW 447,00 at the repair cost, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. A written request for appraisal, a written report and an appraisal;

1. The Defendant asserts that, after the occurrence of an accident, the incident was cut off at the Dong pedal for mobile parking, the Defendant was licked at the accident, and that the instant vehicle was driven by an abnormal route due to the sudden breakdown of the vehicle, and that it was not intentionally deserted from the site and escaped.

In other words, the vehicle of the defendant is the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted into evidence.