The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor as to the gist of the grounds for appeal, it is clearly acknowledged that the victim was injured.

2. Although the appellate court did not have a new objective reason that could affect the formation of a documentary evidence in its trial process, when it intends to re-examine the first instance court's judgment after ex post facto and ex post facto determination, the first instance court's determination as evidence was clearly erroneous.

There should be reasonable grounds to deem that the argument leading to the fact-finding is remarkably unfair due to the violation of logical and empirical rules to maintain the judgment as it is, and without such exceptional circumstances, the judgment on the fact-finding of the first instance court should not be reversed without permission (see Supreme Court Decision 2016Do18031, Mar. 22, 2017). There is no objective reason that may affect the formation of a new conviction in the trial, and there is no reasonable ground to deem that maintaining the judgment of the lower court is remarkably unfair in comparison with the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the content of the reasoning of the lower court.

Therefore, the prosecutor's argument of mistake is without merit.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.