logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.07.27 2018고정1546
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a sports engineer.

On November 25, 2017, at around 18:25, the Defendant received an emergency room in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, in order to receive a treatment for a hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the hump of the body

그 후 경찰관들이 현장에 출동하여 피고인을 달래 어 치료를 받을 수 있도록 조치하였으나, 피고인은 같은 날 19:20 경 치료를 마치고 수납을 하는 과정에서 피해자에게 또 다시 약 5분 간 욕설을 하고 플라스틱 재질의 메모지함을 집어던지려고 시늉하는 등 행패를 부려 위력으로써 병원 원무과 업무를 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to the order of provisional payment is a hospital where patients need to take stability, and thus, the result of the disturbance is more severe than that of the business-related property and mental disorder.

Even after the police officers have arranged the situation and received medical treatment, the defendant would have a evise time to interfere with their business, such as sub-performance of happiness to the officers and employees.

It seems that patients and drones who have received for the time have reported and unstable situations caused by the defendant.

It is also an unfavorable factor in sentencing that the defendant's behavior that prevents business from being obstructed and punished is repeated from around 2014.

Defendant.

arrow