Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the violation of the Road Traffic Act are those engaged in driving of Cunst Motor Vehicles.

On July 3, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on July 3, 2014, and proceeded at the intersection of the shooting distance in front of the Chungcheongbuk-do as a supplement to the Chungcheongbuk-do Cheongju-do Cheongju-do, at about 20km speed from the Chungcheong Station.

At that time, the location is a private-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the driver by making the front door and the left and right well and observing the signal.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting this, the victim D(35 years of age) driven by the victim D(35 years of age) who proceeds from a booming act on the right side of the Defendant's vehicle in front of the right side of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury to the victim D in light of the foregoing occupational negligence for approximately two weeks, and the victim F (the victim 54 years old) who is the Defendant’s vehicle, to suffer from the injury of climatic salt, tensions, etc. requiring a two-day medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant damaged the damaged vehicle’s repair cost of KRW 3,347,441.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of Cununst Motor Vehicle.

Although a motor vehicle not covered by mandatory insurance is prohibited from being operated on the road, the defendant operated the said motor vehicle without purchasing mandatory insurance at the same time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. In light of the consistent and concrete parts of the witness’s statements concerning the Defendant’s violation of the signal signals at each of the witness D, G and H’s respective statutory statements, G as witness of the instant case, and H cannot find the reason or motive for the Defendant’s false statement to mislead the Defendant, and the attitude and attitude in this court.