A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2017 Highest 2085] On September 10, 2017, the Defendant opened a door-to-door 00:40 on September 10, 2017, which was parked on the street, and opened a door-to-door Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas Mas

[2018 Highest 1372] On August 7, 2017, the Defendant reported to the police that the victim F was at least 900,000 won in the gallon 5-on-line cell phone, and did not take necessary procedures, such as returning to the victim, on the road around the 2nd Dong administrative welfare center in the 424 roads of Seocheon-si, Seocheon-ro, Busan. 00, the Defendant acquired it.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 2085]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on investigation (specific suspect) and a report on investigation (a CCTV investigation for security guards);

1. A written statement of D (2018 Height 1372);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing personal telephone photographs;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (a point of intention) and Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act (a point of intent) and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution: The fact that the nature of each of the crimes of this case is not good, the fact that the punishment of a fine is imposed on one occasion due to the thief, the circumstances favorable to the fact that the victims have not been agreed upon: The amount of damage is relatively small, and the amount of damage is relatively small, and the various sentencing conditions indicated in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, motive and background of the crime, means of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as per the Disposition