1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver a building indicating the attached real estate;

B. 6,400,000 won and December 28, 2014

1. The following facts can be acknowledged in light of the purport of the entire pleadings in each statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 3.

On June 21, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant, setting the lease deposit amount of KRW 10,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 400,000, and the lease term from June 28, 2013 to June 28, 2016.

At the time of the above contract, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed that the lessor may terminate the above lease contract immediately if the Defendant, who is the lessee, fails to pay the rent more than twice consecutively.

B. From June 28, 2013, the Defendant resided in the instant building from around June 28, 2013, and did not pay the car from July 28, 2013.

C. Around November 5, 2014, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of his/her intention to terminate the said lease agreement if the Plaintiff did not pay all the overdue rent within 15 days.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not pay the Plaintiff the overdue charge until now.

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, the above lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant is terminated by a lawful termination of the plaintiff, barring special circumstances, the defendant is obligated to deliver the building of this case to the plaintiff, and the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff the interest calculated at the rate of 6,400,000 won in arrears and 400,000 won in monthly rent from December 28, 2014 to the completion of delivery of the building of this case as requested by the plaintiff.

B. As to this, the defendant asserts that there is a lease deposit exceeding the overdue rent, but even if the lease deposit exists, it cannot be said that the monthly rent does not occur. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion