A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who engages in transportation business with the trade name of the "B" and is an employee of C, who is an employee of C, in order to avoid the regulation when the vehicle height is found to be exceeded by the vehicle height from the public inspection room located in the 775, west-gu, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-gu, YU.S., the defendant was willing to alter the limited vehicle operation permit to avoid the regulation.

On March 3, 2015, at the above B office located in Jung-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Jung-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, the Defendant prepared and printed “D (D)” using a computer without authority for the purpose of exercising, and then changed one copy of a limited vehicle operation permit, which is an official document in the name of the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, by placing the printed materials in the vehicle number column of the G restricted vehicle operation permit already permitted, and then reproducing it again. At around 10:19 on the same day, the Defendant, at the above B office, sent one copy of the altered vehicle operation permit to the above E by facsimile as if it was duly formed with the foregoing alteration.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of E and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a vehicle certificate violating restrictions on operation, a limited vehicle operation permit submitted by a driver by facsimile, and a limited vehicle operation permit issued by I of the permission number;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act, Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (8 to 2 months) of category 1 (8 to 2 years) such as forgery, alteration, etc. of official documents, etc. (a non-business, non-structured person] [decision of sentence] The crime of this case is likely to undermine the trust in the authenticity of official documents and interfere with over-control affairs, causing poor quality of the crime. However, the defendant is against the mistake, and the defendant is in violation of the Road Act.