logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.07.24 2019고단1723
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 10, 2019, at around 18:41, the Defendant, in a female toilet with “C” operated by the Defendant on the Seo-gu 1st floor in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, taken pictures of the body of another person, who could cause sexual humiliation or humiliation by using smartphones, which are a device with a 35 seconds video camera function, and the body of another person, who is unable to know the name of the female victim, going back from the body to the gallone of A5 smartphones, by executing the galloning function of the Defendant’s gallone.

2. On February 15, 2019, at around 21:14, at the same place as Paragraph 1, the Defendant taken pictures against his/her will another person’s body, where the Defendant, at the same time as that of Paragraph 1, a female victim, who is unable to know his/her name by the said method, took pictures of the body of the other person, who is likely to cause sexual humiliation or shame using a smartphone, a device with approximately one minute 35 seconds function.

3. On February 22, 2019, the Defendant, at the same place as Paragraph 1, at around 19:11, taken pictures of another person’s body against his/her will, using smartphones, which are devices with approximately 58 seconds of video pictures, in which the name of the female victim could not be known by the said method, could cause sexual humiliation or shame.

4. On February 24, 2019, at around 19:40, at the same place as Paragraph 1, the Defendant taken the body of another person who may cause sexual humiliation or sense of shame using a smartphone, which is a device with approximately 10 seconds of dynamic images, in which the victim D (here, 39 years of age) is viewed as a melting base by the aforementioned method, against his/her will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A photograph of a criminal image closure;

1. Digital evidence analysis and new data (USB);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow