The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant does not repeat the crime while disposing of the vehicle operated by the defendant at the time of the crime of this case, and the fact that employees of the defendant's family and the defendant's family and the defendant want to take a preference against the defendant is favorable to the defendant.

However, the Defendant was punished several times due to drinking or unlicensed driving, and on January 9, 2018, the most recently committed the same kind of crime in this case during the grace period even though he was subjected to a suspended sentence on January 9, 2018.

At the time of the operation of the instant case, substantial traffic risks have occurred, such as receiving structures (balld) at the entrance of the apartment, which had been living at the time of the instant driving, and receiving 112 reports.

The circumstances before and after the crime are not good, such as putting security guards who reported 112 at the time when they were called to the police.

As above, the lower court appears to have determined the punishment within the reasonable scope of discretion by fully taking into account the favorable or unfavorable circumstances to the Defendant, and there is no special change in circumstances that could change the sentencing after the lower judgment.

In addition, examining the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, circumstances after the crime, and criminal records, various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, it does not seem that the sentence of the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.