(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.11.16 2016고단2995

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.11.16 2016고단2995

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 6, 2016, at around 03:35, the Defendant: (a) on the front side of the seed and seedling station located in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant boardedd as a guest on the top of the D-si located in Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul; (b) around 04:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (c) demanded the victim to be asked for an accurate destination after arriving in the front of the YY Station located in the front of the YY and asking for an accurate destination; and (d) said victim to be asked to calculate taxi charges on several occasions, “grads, sches,” thereby threateninging the victim to take drinking at around 30 minutes; and (d) said, she spawds down two times at the front glass.

Accordingly, the defendant prevented other customers from getting on a taxi, thereby obstructing the victim's taxi business by force.

2. At around 04:30 on July 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) reported the damage by: (b) having driven a taxi while the victim was on board the Defendant at the seat of the F police box located in Ma, the Defendant: (c) while driving the taxi at the seat of the police box located in Ma; (d) having been working for the police station, the police officer G, who was a police officer at the seat of the police station working for the police officer, and the police officer: (c) having reported the damage by stating that “I do not pay for the taxi expenses without the purpose of the senior guest; and (d) having been urged by G and H to return home on the same day on the ground that “I want to do so so, she would do so, she would do so, she would do so; and (e) having tried to kill the cab at his own taxi on two occasions by her hand; and (e) having tried to do assault and assault the flab.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officer on the maintenance of order, such as the service within a police box.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s statement of the police interrogation protocol of the defendant as to the defendant’s court statement

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each statement of C and H;

1. The Defendant is not aware of the taxi expense receipt, the police officer’s photograph, the Sistib (CCTV), and the Sistib’s photographic data at the time of each of the instant crimes.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.12.10 2015고단1799

-대구지방법원 2015.08.25 2015고단2097

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.11.27 2015고단979

-광주지방법원 2015.06.17 2015고단1288

-서울북부지방법원 2015.12.23 2015고단3576