logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2019.08.21 2019고단251
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant shall pay B, who is an applicant for compensation, KRW 202,922,70,00.

3.2

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around December 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim B began with the first meeting of the victim in Full-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) and met with the victim (hereinafter “B”) at the time of the first meeting of the victim in Full-time Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City”), “B performed an act related to the meatology, and did so with many funeral services from his care without any other’s learning,” and had his/her own re-defense. The victim took advantage of the fact that the victim had a sense of self-defense, he/she would receive high interest if he/she borrowed the money. If he/she borrowed money, he/she would have to pay a criminal agreement or pay a fine. He/she borrowed money to appoint a lawyer. It is required that he/she borrowed money to lend money to him/her. It is decided that he/she would have received money under the name of the victim by deceiving him/her and using the money in the name of the victim by fraud, etc., and received the money under his/her normal name and payment.”

On December 28, 2016, the Defendant stated that “There is no difference of money to receive a monthly wage from the Plaintiff to the Masan-dong, which is located in the Masan-dong, Masan-gu, Masan-si.” The Defendant borrowed money to the Defendant. He would pay the money to the Masan-dong.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have any special property or income due to bad credit standing at the time. The Defendant borrowed money from the beginning to use it for living expenses and repayment of debts, etc., and thus, there was no intention or ability to pay the money normally even if he borrowed money from the victim.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 1,00,000 from the F Association account in the former E name of the Defendant on the same day under the pretext of borrowing from the victim.

arrow