A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On June 21, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on March 15, 2017, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 6 million for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking the measurement of drinking), respectively.

On November 20, 2020, the Defendant driven a D car under the influence of alcohol with 0.162% alcohol concentration of 0.162% from the distance near “C” located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B to the distance of approximately 14 momaro 14 (Sodong) of the same Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Investigation report (report on the situation of the driver in charge); and

1. A paper of measurement of drinking alcohol;

1. Written inquiry about criminal history, etc.;

1. Application of investigation reports (limited to previous convictions and attachment of written judgments) and statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. 보호 관찰, 사회봉사명령, 수강명령 형법 제 62조의 2 양형의 이유 ◎ 불리한 정상 ; 2013. 6. 21. 도로 교통법위반( 음주 운전) 죄로 벌금형으로 처벌 받은 범죄 전력이 있고, 2017. 3. 17. 도로 교통법위반( 음주 측정거부) 죄로 벌금형으로 처벌 받은 범죄 전력이 있는데도, 다시 단기간 내에 같은 종류의 이 사건 범행을 범한 점, 혈 중 알코올 농도가 0.162% 로 상당히 높았던 점, ‘ 앞 차가 만취한 것처럼 운전 // 왔다 갔다 천천히 간다’ 는 신고에 따라 단속된 것으로, 당시 피고인은 ‘ 발음이 부정확’ 했고, 얼굴은 붉었으며, ‘ 중심을 못 잡고 비틀거리’ 는 상태로, 정상적으로 운전을 할 수 없는 상황이었는데도 적지 않은 거리를 운전한 점 등 ◎ 유리한 정상 ; 벌금형보다 더 무거운 형으로 처벌 받은 범죄 전력이 없는 점, 자신의 잘못을 뉘우치며 반성하고 있는 점 등 ◎ 그...