The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the punishment of imprisonment for two years, three years of suspended execution, three years of probation, two years of probation, 50,000 won in cash, 175,00 won in cash, 175,00 won in cash, 1,00 won in cash, 2 books of business, 153,012,00 won in each confiscation of cell phones, 153,012,00 won in addition) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the judgment, it is favorable for the Defendant to recognize and reflect the instant crime, and to not repeat the crime by seeking a new workplace, and the fact that the Defendant is an initial offender who has no criminal record.

However, in full view of various sentencing conditions shown in the argument of this case including the fact that sexual traffic intermediary acts are not much harmful to society, so severe punishment is required, the defendant's business period has expired, as well as the profits gained therefrom have been considerable, etc., which are disadvantageous to the defendant, and there is no particular change in sentencing conditions compared to the court below's decision. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.