logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2016.09.02 2015가합102661
매매대금
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s KRW 769,459,960 among the Plaintiff’s counterclaim and KRW 395,105,560 among the Plaintiff’s counterclaim, the Defendant (Counterclaim Defendant) shall have the effect on January 1, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 22, 2013, the Plaintiff was awarded a contract for the construction period between May 22, 2013 and September 21, 2014 by setting the period of construction from May 22, 2013 to the construction period from May 22, 2013 to the construction period of the Gu-U.S. E facility development project implemented by the Gu-Si C and D (hereinafter “instant earth construction”).

B. On July 15, 2013, the Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with the Defendant for the sale of blasting cancer generated from the instant land construction (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) and agreed as follows.

2. Period of contract: July 15, 2013 to April 21, 2015;

3. Contract amount: 2.1 billion won;

(a) Unit price for blasting cancer: 4,200 won (per one cubic meter, but the time limit for arrival of designated places around Crackers);

(b) Quantity: 500,000 cubic meters;

(c)in principle, transportation shall be made at the designated place around the Cruritius, and where inevitable, entry shall be made at the designated place in consultation with the plaintiff (the defendant) and Eul (the defendant).

4. Payment of the sale price;

(a) The payment of the price shall be closed at the end of the current month and, in principle, shall be made in cash by the end of the following month;

[Defendant B] 5.B. 5.

A (Plaintiff) provides a place where cracks equipment is installed within the said construction site (as approximately 10,000 square meters), and provides B (Defendant) with a written consent to land use required for reporting installation, and other documents necessary for authorization, such as cancer generation design, etc.

In addition, through the documents provided, Eul (Defendant) shall proceed and complete all authorization and permission work at the expense of Eul (Defendant) and (Omission).

C. Around August 6, 2013, the Defendant filed a report on the selection and crushing of aggregate with the former Mayor along with the instant sales contract. However, the former U.S. Mayor was newly established on January 21, 2013 by Article 12-2 of the Enforcement Rule of the Aggregate Extraction Act on January 23, 2013, even in cases where aggregate extraction is incidental to the projects implemented by other statutes, the aforementioned aggregate extraction required for the relevant project is conducted.

arrow