logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2015.07.15 2014고합84
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(장애인강간)
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be three years of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for four years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

In addition, the person subject to the request for attachment order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendants") will be the vice president of the Daban District Court in 2008, and the victim D (hereinafter referred to as 44 years old) who has a mental disorder equivalent to class 2 of the intellectual disability with the 3rd grade and intelligence index 47, and the Doban index 50 was known during the process of assisting the victim D (hereinafter referred to as the "defendants") who has a mental disability equivalent to class 2 of the intellectual disability

The defendant knew that the above victim has a physical disability with the left side of the bridge and lacks intellectual ability to do so, and tried to have sexual intercourse with the victim by using it.

1. From March to April 14, 2012, around 14:00, the Defendant: (a) was on a passenger car with his own gallon to put the said victim into the victim’s house; and (b) was on a gallon E nearby the west-gun located in the victim’s residence; (c) was set up a passenger car with the said gallon; and (d) was placed on the victim’s chest and boat.

Accordingly, the victim "I", "I Ma", and the suspect "I am only when I am", and sexual intercourse with sexual intercourse once after the threat was made.

2. On April 14, 2014, around 14:00, the Defendant: (a) moved the victim into the office of the Cbuan branch office located in F in Banananan-gun, Seoan-gun, by burning the victim on his gallon bus terminal near the bus terminal located in Banan-gun, the Defendant left the victim’s clothes, left the victim’s shoulder back to the office of the Cbuan-gun in Banan-gun, and left the victim out of all the clothes of the victim.

Accordingly, the victim has sexual intercourse with sexual intercourse once after he threatened the victim with the defect that the victim would be free from, or with the influenite ruling.

3. At around 10:00 on May 4, 2014, the Defendant: (a) entered the C office located in the Northwest-gun G, beyond 10:0, the Defendant: (b) visited the victim by taking the victim’s hand; (c) locked the victim’s hand; (d) locked the victim; and (e) exempted the victim from the victim’s clothes.

Accordingly, when the victim resisted that “Ampha, Ampha, Empha,” the victim tolds that “Ampha, Ampha, Ampha,” it is sexual intercourse once after threatening the victim.

arrow