logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.11.14 2012고단5360
사기
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of two years and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and six months, respectively.

Seized evidence 11,816.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The telephone financial fraud organization assumes the roles of the Chinese local " Call Center", "China", "Korean Total Liability", "Korean Liability", "Korean Total Liability", "Korean Liability", "Korean Liability", "Korean Liability", "Korean Liability", and "Korean Liability", "Account", "Account", "Account", "Account", "Account", "Account", "Account", "Account", "Transfer of Cash deposited in the passbook", "Transfer of Money deposited in the passbook," "Transfer of Money deposited in China," "Account," and "Account," which are operated in the form of a system of occupation in preparation for arrest, and is operated in preparation for arrest.

On September 2012, the Defendants, at the direction of the Chinese call center or China or F, deposited the cash deposited in the passbook with the name-free Chinese call center's staff and Chinese F, etc., to make a false statement that other members of the call center's staff and other members of the investigation team will ask the domestic head of the passbook traders to ask the agricultural cooperatives or the public prosecutor's office, the police, and the financial institutions to transfer the cash deposited in the so-called large passbook, and made them deposit with the so-called large passbook to receive 2% of the withdrawn amount at the expense, the Defendants made the withdrawal of the cash deposited in the so-called large passbook from the members of the investigation center in name and delivered it to the remittance of the cash deposited in the passbook.

The Defendants made a false statement to the effect that, according to the above public offering, the employees of the Chinese call center and the Chinese F, etc. on September 19, 2012, the Defendants made telephone conversations with the victim G and the Defendant would have the Defendant win a loan if they sent the necessary guarantee cost, etc. for the loan to the victim.

arrow