logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.18 2015고정2884
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are union members of the desired solidarity M non-regular branch (hereinafter referred to as the “N branch”) respectively.

[Case-based background] N branch was established around March 30, 2014 by a trade union consisting of 50 co-contractors who signed an entrustment contract with M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “M”) for the establishment, repair work, etc. of Internet communications networks.

The N Branch, from October 21, 2014 to recognize the status of the general workers of the Korea Workers' Federation (hereinafter referred to as the "KK") to whom the right to negotiate the 50 collaborative group was delegated by the above 50 collaborative companies, and from May 21, 2014, in order to implement the requirements, such as the recognition of the status of workers of the general workers and the direct participation in collective bargaining among wages and M, developed a indefinite old-age in front of the Ncom Telecom Head Office from around October 21, 2014. From around November 20, 2014, the NF started into the full-time strike business, notified the demand for labor union aid, such as wage and fund contribution, etc., and declared a final negotiation display on December 15, 2014.

On the other hand, N branch's labor union members requested to continue to participate directly in collective bargaining M, and decided to enter the N Group's affiliates into the N Group's N Group's building that is occupied by the N Group's affiliate president, as the N Group's affiliates were not accepted.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On January 6, 2015, Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint residential intrusion) entered the N Group’s headquarters by closely attaching 600 and 600 N Group staff members of N Group’s headquarters with a view to requiring N Group’s executive officers to hold an interview. In order to occupy the fourth floor of the same building occupied by N Group PP’s denied Q, the Defendants entered the N Group P’s 212 union members and the 4th customer meeting room via emergency stairs and elevators.

arrow