1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a real estate broker operating E Licensed Real Estate Agents.

On October 11, 2016, the Plaintiff introduced Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”) (hereinafter “Defendant C”) to sell the building (hereinafter “instant building”) related to the 9th floor of reinforced concrete structure (the 1 and 2nd class neighborhood living facilities), Seo-gu, Gwangju-gu, and the 9th floor of the instant building (hereinafter “instant building”).

B. On January 19, 2017, Defendant B’s representative G expressed that Defendant C’s employees H, I, J, and Defendant C intended to sell the instant building, and Defendant C would decide whether to purchase the instant building after examining the profitability of the instant building. The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s employees participated in the said consultation.

C. On February 6, 2017, Defendant B received a proposal for purchase from Defendant C to make an investment trust designated by Defendant C or Defendant C as the purchaser of the instant building.

Accordingly, on February 13, 2017, Defendant B, and Defendant D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant D”) entered into a business agreement setting the value of the instant building, the amount of inherited lease deposit, the actual inspection, the period of negotiation, etc.

On March 23, 2017, Defendant B sold the instant building to L Co., Ltd., a trust company of the fund managed by Defendant D (hereinafter “instant purchase”) and completed the registration of ownership transfer on May 8, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 8, 9 (if there is a tentative number, including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, and Eul evidence 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the plaintiff has mediated the sale of this case

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion did not attend the conclusion site of the instant trade contract, but Defendant B.