(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.07.26 2017가단241424

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2019.07.26 2017가단241424

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 48,192,531 among the Plaintiff and KRW 46,850,521 among the Plaintiff, shall be KRW 1,080,140 from December 10, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts are companies with the purpose of manufacturing and distributing natural hair clothes, and the defendant served as the head of the branch office directly operated by the plaintiff from September 2009 to October 2014.

The plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant under suspicion that he/she acquired KRW 48,965,371 from the plaintiff by reporting false sales performance as if he/she had worked as a main or subsidiary member.

The prosecutor in charge prosecuted the defendant as a crime of fraud with regard to the remaining amount of money excluding the sum of 772,840 won for September 2009 and October 2019, among the above facts of complaint, and the defendant was convicted of the following facts of the crime, and the judgment was finalized on June 19, 2019.

[Judgment of the Supreme Court Decision 2018Da399 Decided September 19, 2018 (two years of suspended sentence for four months), Busan District Court Decision 2018No3619 (Supreme Court Decision 2018No3619) Decided April 18, 2019, Supreme Court Decision 2019Do529 decided June 14, 2019] The defendant of criminal facts (the defendant of this case; hereinafter the same shall apply) directly manages the Busan of the victimized Company (the plaintiff of this case; hereinafter the same shall apply) on November 2009. In the event that the victimized Company sells the volume of the volume of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the share of the Busan.

However, in fact C did not have any sales performance since it had not been worked as a Modial intern at the Busan directly operated store.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victimized company as above and caused the victimized company to account in the name of C around December 15, 2009.

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 2018.09.19 2018고단399

-창원지방법원 2012.09.13 2011고단3059

-서울북부지방법원 2015.10.28 2014고단3597

-울산지방법원 2016.01.15 2015노547

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2016.01.22 2015고단776