logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원경주지원 2014.10.07 2012가단5646
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 226,764,612 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 7,000,000 for Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 4,00,000 for Plaintiff C and D, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 1, 2011, the status of the parties A is a person who was employed by the Defendant as a inorganic contract worker in the racing and city crematorium in operation on March 1, 201, and the Plaintiff B is the spouse of the Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are Plaintiff A’s own consciousness.

B. (i) The Plaintiff A served more than one hour and 30 minutes than the normal working hours every day since he entered the racing market.

Shed Plaintiff A became a holiday for only one year after he was employed in the racing-si crematorium.

【Plaintiff A is mainly responsible for the inspection of the condition of cremation in the overall cremation and cremation and for the storage of remains after cremation completion.

x) The plaintiff A buried the body on an average of four minutes a day, and the time required for cremation of a body is about 1 hour and 30 minutes.

C. (1) On February 4, 2012, Plaintiff A was diagnosed as “Ampire” and treated as “Ampire,” while working at a normal morning on February 4, 2012.

B. At around 15:00 on February 5, 2012, Plaintiff A, who was in the emergency room of the East National University, the East National University, the race hospital, and received transfer and treatment by the following day. On February 7, 2012, Plaintiff A, who was in the emergency room of the East National University, was provided medical treatment due to the recurrence of symptoms on February 7, 2012. As a result of the examination, Plaintiff A, who was in the form of spinecopic chronsis (hereinafter “the instant disaster”).

(A) received the diagnosis of the Company.

Consolidatedly, Plaintiff A was hospitalized by September 30, 2013 and received hospital treatment.

(1) The plaintiff A asserted that the accident of this case constitutes an occupational accident and filed an application for insurance benefits with the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation branch office.

The Director of the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation requested the Daegu Occupational Disease Determination Committee to deliberate whether the instant accident was an occupational disease, and the Daegu Occupational Disease Determination Committee is the Daegu Occupational Disease Determination Committee.

arrow