A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

Around July 2018, the Defendant, “2019 High-class 463, the Defendant,” made a false statement that “A victim C was requested by the Dispute Settlement Co., Ltd., a customer in Yongsan-gu Seoul, to supply a Hand-type vocational system from E stores.” (b) if the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 300 million to B, he purchased 30,000 hand-type Hand-type 30,000,000 won from the manufacturer, and then supplied to E stores through the Dispute Settlement Co., Ltd, and paid the principal amount of KRW 30,000,000 to September 30, 2018 without molding the amount of KRW 50,00.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not purchase a Hand-type sign with money from the victim to pay his personal debt. At the time, the Defendant did not have any property, while at the time, the Defendant did not have any property, and even if he borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to pay the debt.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 295 million from the victim, including KRW 28 million on July 17, 2018, KRW 160 million on July 25, 2018, KRW 17 million on July 26, 2018, and KRW 295 million on July 26, 2018.

The Defendant, as the team leader of F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “F”), received money from the victim G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim Co., Ltd.”) with ordinary F transaction with the Defendant for the purpose of paying his/her debts, with the aim of receiving the money for the purpose of paying his/her debts.

On January 16, 2019, the Defendant called, “Around January 16, 2019, at his own residence located in the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H building I, the Defendant would have the victim company’s director live at a level below the unit price of the city, by phoneing to J, which is less than the market price: Provided, That if the purchase price is paid in the name of L account operating the company that operates the company that is called K because it may be doubtful by another company, the Defendant would have purchased the company from the above K.” On the same day, the victim company’s total sum of KRW 41 million from the victim company as the purchase price.