logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2019.09.19 2019고단131
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2019 Highest 131"

1. On December 27, 2018, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving the C 2 truck without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 1km from the Geum River from the Geum River basin of Sejong-gun, Daegu-gun, to the front road from around 13:23 on the same day.

2. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of the above Poter 2 cargo vehicles.

On December 27, 2018, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on December 13:23, 2018, while driving a four-lane road in front of the E-cafeteria in Daegu-gun D, the Defendant continued to drive the said cargo vehicle, one-lane from the west to the west.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to reduce speed in making a U.S., and to check whether there are other vehicles on the surrounding and opposite roads, and to prevent accidents.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was found to have been on the front part of the said cargo vehicle, with G Costaex’s back-of-stoper part, which was stopped by the victim F while getting on board the opposite vehicle line by negligence.

The Defendant continued to leave the site as it is and stopped on the right side of the Hast Systa car owned by the victim H, which was parked on the above cargo lane while escaping about about 1km, and stopped on that spot, as the Defendant continued to leave the site, left the right side of the Hast car owned by the victim J, which was behind the right side of the Kaca car owned by the victim J, and stopped on the left side of the Kaca car owned by the victim L, while trying to escape continuously after going to leave the site.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s above occupational duties.

arrow