1.(a)

The plaintiffs and defendant E Co., Ltd. are real estate listed in the attached Table 1.

1. Basic facts

A. Although Plaintiff A supplied G with an amount equivalent to KRW 173,240,000 for NC processed Goods between October 1, 2015 and October 15, 2017, Plaintiff A filed an application for a payment order of KRW 88,200,000 for the payment of the price of the goods and the delay damages therefor, and the payment order was finalized on January 18, 2018 (Seoul District Court Branch Branch Decision 2017 tea779) (No. 2), Plaintiff B filed an application for a payment order of KRW 173,240,000 among the price of the goods, and the lease order was finalized on March 31, 2016 to March 30, 2017; Plaintiff B was paid KRW 30,000,000 for lease and delayed damages; Plaintiff B was paid KRW 300,000 for lease and delayed damages.

(F) Plaintiff C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff C”)

() Although G supplied gold parts from around December 3, 2015 to March 31, 2017, it applied for a payment order of KRW 40,162,598 of the price of the goods and delay damages therefrom. On December 16, 2017, Plaintiff D supplied G with gold design programs from October 30, 2015 to May 31, 2017, but filed an application for a payment order of KRW 19,214,000 of the price of the goods and delay damages therefrom, and the payment order of KRW 40,162,598 was finalized on December 19, 2017.

(F) Daegu District Court 2017 tea808.2

Defendants and G transactional relationship 1) G is a person engaged in gold-type manufacturing business, etc. under the trade name of “I”, and Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant E”).

The company is engaged in the manufacture and sale of special steel iron, and the defendant.