logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.06.19 2013고단9410
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. Defendant A is a person who operates a general game room in the "E Gameland" located in Busan Dong-gu, Busan, and Defendant B is an employee of the above game room.

No person shall provide game products for the distribution or use of the contents different from those of the rating, or display or keep such products for such purposes.

On March 14, 2012, “disber game” was classified by the Game Rating Board as a competent game in which game was conducted at each user’s option.

Defendant

A 피고인은 2013. 8. 21.경 위 게임랜드에서, 스트레이트플러쉬 당첨 전에 용 애니메이션 화면이 나와 당첨이 예시되는 예시기능을 갖도록 개변조된 ‘디스커버리' 게임기 20대를 설치하고, 일명 게임 자동진행장치인 ’똑딱이‘를 제공하는 방법으로 불특정 다수인의 이용에 제공하였다.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from those classified by the Game Rating Board for use.

B. Defendant B aided and abetted the violation of the Act on Promotion of Game Industry of the Republic of Korea by facilitating the above violation of the Act on Promotion of Game Industry of the Republic of Korea, while managing the entire business by being employed by Defendant A at the above date,

2. According to the records, although a DNA game machine is recognized as having a different example and function from the rating, it is insufficient to view that the defendants provided it to customers with the knowledge of the alteration of the game machine to the extent that the submitted evidence alone would be excluded from reasonable doubt.

In addition, the fact that there was an automatic system in the above game machine is recognized, but only the fact that the automatic system was installed and used can not be deemed to have provided game products different from the contents of the rating.

3. Conclusion, this case.

arrow