logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고단7862
절도등
Text

As to the theft of the 2017 Highest 7862 case, the defendant's judgment and the fraud of the 2018 Highest 469 case.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on July 26, 2017, and on August 3, 2017, the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 3, 2017, and is currently in the grace period.

【Criminal facts】 When the Defendant received a demand without paying the money borrowed from the persons who borrowed the money, the Defendant committed a theft of money, articles, etc. in a parking lot, etc. in order to raise money.

At around 16:00 on October 2, 2017, the Defendant discovered that the Defendant was not locked a vehicle owned by the victim C in the Seocho-gu Seoul Seocho-gu 9-ro 32 “Surlar 32” parking lot by using the fact that the door is highly likely not to locked when a parked vehicle is not opened, and that the Defendant stolen the vehicle with the cash of KRW 3.7 million owned by the victim, which was located in the erobbbbbb Park, by opening the steering gate and opening it.

From that time until October 22, 2017, the Defendant, as indicated in the list of crimes in the attached Form, stolen cash and articles worth KRW 8,460,00 in total five times in total, as stated in the list of crimes.

The Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on July 26, 2017, and on August 3, 2017, the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 3, 2017, and is currently in the grace period.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On October 16, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim E, who reported and contacted 20,000 won, stating that “The Defendant will send a new letter if he/she remitted 20,000 won to 220,000 won.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have such belief, and even if he receives money from the injured party, he shall issue a new letter to the injured party.

arrow