logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.07.19 2016고단2028
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 17, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2,50,000,000 from the Jeju District Court to a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act, and on April 19, 2016, the above court issued a summary order of KRW 3,00,000,000 as a fine for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.

[Criminal facts] On August 18, 2016, the Defendant driven CK5 vehicles at a section of about 100 meters from pulse hotel to the road front of the Jeju-si hotel, which is under influence of alcohol level of 0.138% among the blood transfusion around 03:07.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 984" is the father and mother of the victim D (E).

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant: (a) moved a victim who was enrolled in the second grade of the new elementary school at the time at the time at the residence located in the Jeju-si, Jeju-si, G, and 828; (b) was engaged in entertainment business; and (c) did not take measures to send the victim to the new elementary school or to transfer the victim from March 2, 2017 to April 18, 2017 without any special reason, and left the said father-si’s residence in the said father-si.

Accordingly, the defendant neglected the education of the child under his protection.

On March 6, 2017, the defendant of "2017 Highest 1170", in addition to the summary order of a fine of KRW 2 million issued by the Jeju District Court on March 6, 2017, the records of the same crime are eight times more.

On October 24, 2016, the Defendant called the victim H at a 09:00 no higher than that of Jeju on October 24, 2016, and called the victim H, “The security deposit is changed to studio by the Audio. It is now paid to the Defendant, because it is working at the main place at the present, which is being paid a monthly wage.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, even if the defendant did not have certain income and assets under the pretext of multiple fraudulent crimes, and received the main salary, it is insufficient to use it as the repayment of existing debts or the cost of living.

arrow