logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2019.07.25 2018가단111201
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from September 28, 2018 to July 25, 2019.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff and C are legally married couple who completed the marriage report on September 9, 2010, and children born on October 31, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion from May 2017 to the date of the instant lawsuit, even though C was aware that it was the father of the child, the Defendant, despite being aware that C had been the father of the child, continued to teach C with C and applied for divorce.

As a result, the plaintiff is suffering from a serious mental suffering, the plaintiff claims 31,000,000 won as consolation money.

B. The Defendant alleged that C was an unmarried person and came to know that C had a career of marriage while making preparations for marriage with C known that C had a career of marriage.

However, while making a false statement that C had already been divorced with the Defendant, the Defendant was aware that C had been divorced from the Plaintiff, and the Defendant did not commit any unlawful act with the knowledge that C was the father of the instant lawsuit, and that C was the father of the case.

3. Facts of recognition;

A. C, a D employee, began with the Defendant who was aware of the E Hospital doctor’s behavior on May 2016, and began with the Defendant, and was in preparation for marriage since the beginning of 2017 by mixing the Defendant with the Defendant.

B. On July 13, 2017, C continued contact with the Defendant, and around August 2017, the Defendant became aware that C was not the intention of C while questioning the whereabouts of C. A around August 2017, C was aware that C was not the intention, and C was aware of the mobile phone number changed, and C was aware of C’s mobile phone number, and revoked C’s marriage plan.

C. Around that time, the Defendant found the letter that C and the Plaintiff’s residential house were written as “hyma Love” and discussed with the neighbors that C would receive consolation money, and it would not be the case of AF while moving as “(C) and Efranc. Advers. Advers. B, the Defendant’s family and the house are notified of the fact that C and C are family members and the house.

arrow