1. Defendant B’s KRW 30,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from November 17, 2017 to May 29, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff asserts that, on May 26, 2013, the repayment period of KRW 15 million to Defendant B was October 26, 2013; and on May 27, 2013, the repayment period of KRW 15 million was due on November 27, 2013; and on June 17, 2013, the repayment period of KRW 5 million was determined and lent as of November 27, 2013; and on August 1, 2013, the repayment period of KRW 1 million was determined and lent as of December 31, 2013; and Defendant C jointly and severally guaranteed Defendant B’s loan obligations.

The Plaintiff’s repayment period of KRW 1.5 million to Defendant B on May 27, 2013 is November 27, 2013; the repayment period of KRW 5 million on June 17, 2013; and the repayment period of KRW 1 million on August 27, 2013; and the repayment period of KRW 1 million on August 1, 2013 to Defendant B does not conflict between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

However, with respect to Gap evidence No. 2, there is no evidence to acknowledge the authenticity of Gap evidence No. 3-1, 2, and 3 against the defendants, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge the authenticity of Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 4, and witness D's testimony alone. There is no other evidence to acknowledge the authenticity of each of the above documents and the above lending.

Therefore, Defendant B is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff 3 million won with 5% interest per annum from November 17, 2017 to May 29, 2018, and 15% interest per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant B is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim against the defendant B and the claim against the defendant C are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.