Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

In the indictment of around November 3, 2014, the Defendant is named as “ around November 13, 2014,” but it is obvious that it is a clerical error and correct it ex officio.

At the Internet NAVV and China's website, B posted a letter stating that B sells toys (fle , B B T Kaz) and written contact numbers in the column of comments that C wishes to purchase, and as if it was a seller B, the call number as the seller used by C is the number used by the seller, and the victim C is the "E" in the indictment of Defendant C, but it is obvious that it is a clerical error, and it is correct ex officio.

The phrase “a bank account (D) in the name of the company bank account” sent the word “10,000 won”, and the victim C, who believed to be true, received 110,000 won from the above company bank account in the name of the defendant, and acquired it by money from the victim C, etc. to the above bank account in the name of the defendant, and acquired 1,118,000 won in total over 10 times, such as the victim C, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each petition and statement of F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M;

1. N’s statement;

1. Search and seizure inspection warrant and reply;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (to attach CCTV image data and personal information photographs);

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;