The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is unreasonable. 2. The defendant repeatedly committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime during which the execution of the sentence was completed, even though the defendant had been sentenced for a crime similar to those of this case due to fraud, etc.; the degree of the defendant's participation in the process of the act of fund-raising similar to this case is relatively heavy; and the amount of damage is relatively large; there are no data to deem that the victims agree with the victims or the damage was recovered; and there are other various circumstances that are conditions of sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character, character, environment, environment, family relationship, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, etc., it is difficult to view that the first instance court's sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for three years imposed on the defendant within the scope of recommendations of the sentencing guidelines is too unreasonable, and the above argument by the defendant is not acceptable.

3. Accordingly, we cannot accept the Defendant’s appeal under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.