logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.01.13 2016노1592
사기등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the judgment of the court below is too unreasonable that the punishment of KRW 2,00,000 per annum of the crime committed by the court below (2,00,000 won per annum of the crime committed by the court below, and fines of KRW 1,00,000 per annum of the same crime, KRW 4,00,000 per annum of the same crime, KRW 50,000 per annum of the same crime, KRW 7,000 per annum of the same crime, and KRW 5,00,000 per annum of the same crime, and KRW 9,19,000 per annum of the same crime, and KRW 6 months for each crime and attempted to commit the crime) are too unreasonable.

2. In light of the fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case, visual disorder (Grade VI), and the defendant could be tried simultaneously with the crime for which the judgment became final and conclusive, each of the crimes of this case is not good in light of the circumstances and methods of the crime, the victim is a majority and the defendant did not recover from damage, the defendant has a criminal record of 40 times, including seven previous criminal records, and the defendant has an attitude to view the legal order repeatedly and repeatedly committing the crime without going against his own mistake, and other various sentencing conditions of this case, including the period of each of the crimes of this case, frequency of the crime, the amount of the crime, the amount of obtaining, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below cannot be deemed to have exceeded a reasonable discretion.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition (Provided, That the judgment of the court below is corrected ex officio according to Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure).

arrow