logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.28 2015고단2605
민사집행법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On October 13, 2014, the Defendant submitted a property list at the Seoul Central District Court (Seoul Central District Court) of the Seoul Central District Court on the instant case’s application for property specification pursuant to Article 2014Kao-3257 of the Seoul Central District Court (C) and submitted a false property list by failing to indicate or state the type or details of the property as if there were no properties, such as lease deposit claims, wage claims, and deposit claims.

2. It is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant owned the property subject to compulsory execution at the time of submission of the instant property list by the sole basis of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor for determination and conclusion, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the

arrow