logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.11.09 2017노2300
상해등
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The sentence (7 million won in penalty) that the court below rendered by the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal is deemed to be too unhutiled and unfair.

2. The crime of this case, each of the crime of this case, which was committed on March 18, 2016, committed each of the crime of this case against the Defendant, even though the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months for the reason of injury on March 18, 2016 and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the reason of the crime of injury on March 26, 2016, while the Defendant committed each of the crimes of this case against the Defendant, while driving a vehicle not covered by the liability insurance, causing an accident while causing an injury to the victim J.

However, in full view of all other circumstances, including the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects each of the crimes of this case, the fact that all the victims have reached an agreement with the defendant, the fact that there are no criminal records other than the prior criminal records committed by the defendant, the mother of the defendant's mother desires to guide the defendant, and the defendant's wife desires to take the lead, compared to the original court's decision, it is reasonable to respect the sentencing in a case where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing and the sentencing of the original court does not go beyond the reasonable scope of discretion (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015), and other circumstances, which are the conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, environment, sex behavior, motive of the crime, and the circumstances before and after the crime, it cannot be

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow