Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On August 18, 2020, the Defendant reported 112 to the effect that “C” located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Inc. B will not grant any charge to taxi guests,” and subsequently, tried to open and embark the back of the patrol, stating that “the Defendant would be sprinked, sprinked, sprinked, sprinked, sprinked, sprinked, sprinked, sponsed, sprinked, sprinked, sprinked, sprinked, and sprinked, sprinked, sprinked, sprinked, sprinked, etc. of the F.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the above police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. 112 A report processing table;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to report investigation and internal investigation;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the error of the accused in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act was not somewhat weak, the sentencing of the accused is against the accused, the accused’s age, environment, means and results of the commission of the crime (the degree of intimidation and assault) and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc. are considered in light of the following factors: the accused’s age, the environment, the means and consequence of the commission of the crime; and the punishment is determined as ordered.