logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.03.27 2015고정432
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 18, 2012, the Defendant filed a claim for insurance proceeds as if he/she had been hospitalized for a total of 20 days, on the ground that the period from April 26, 2012, to May 15, 2012, the period from April 26, 2012, to May 15, 2012, a member of the Council located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was in excess

However, in fact, the symptoms of the defendant were not hospital treatment, but only hospital treatment can achieve the purpose of medical treatment. In fact, the defendant was merely receiving hospital treatment, and the defendant was not hospitalized in normal terms by viewing personal usage while frequently going out and going out for the above period.

As above, the Defendant deceptioned the victim’s East Fire Insurance and received KRW 1,948,750 as insurance proceeds on May 22, 2012 from the victim’s life insurance on May 21, 2012, and acquired KRW 5,10,000 from the victim’s future Epic insurance on May 17, 2012; KRW 715,000 from the victim’s Samsung Life Insurance on May 17, 2012; KRW 570,000 from the victim’s new life insurance on May 17, 2012; KRW 270,000 from the victim’s Alanz life insurance on May 16, 2012; KRW 170,000 from the victim’s Boan Life Insurance on May 22, 200; KRW 30,000 from the victim’s Republic of Korea on May 16, 2012; and acquired KRW 370,501,25.201.2

2. On November 19, 2012, the Defendant claimed insurance proceeds as if he had received normal hospitalized treatment for 17 days on the ground that the period from October 24, 2012 to November 9, 2012 exceeded the period of bicycle riding in the Dongbu Fire Insurance Office, and the period from October 24, 2012 to November 24, 2012.

However, the symptoms of the defendant were not hospital treatment, but only hospital treatment can achieve the purpose of sufficient treatment, and the defendant was actually receiving hospital treatment.

The Defendant is as above.

arrow