The Defendants are not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a corporation established from April 23, 2012 to December 12 of the same year for the purpose of manufacturing steel and steel plates, processing, and technical development of electric motors and electric motors, both of which are operated by F and operated by F, and Defendant B is a corporation established for the purpose of manufacturing steel and steel plates, processing, and electric motor technology development in Kimhae-si.

1. No person shall misrepresent another person's goods, advertise goods or make a mark that leads the misunderstanding of their quality, content, manufacturing method, use, or quantity, in latter goods or advertisements thereof, or sell, distribute, import, or export goods using such method or mark;

On July 8, 2014, the Defendant removed and sold the name plates (G) of the second type of ship ship for the main power-driven type of ship that had been produced and sold by the victim G at the G G G G-si site of Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, Ltd., and sold it to “I sports sales store.”

Accordingly, the Defendant sold goods with a mark misrepresenting or misleading the victim G goods company.

2. Defendant B, in relation to the Defendant’s business at the same date, time, and place as described in the preceding paragraph, sold goods bearing a mark indicating or misleading the victim G goods company.

2. Article 2 subparag. 1 of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (hereinafter “Unfair Competition Prevention Act”) lists the types of unfair competition acts limited, and defines the act of misrepresenting another person’s goods in this item. The act of misrepresenting another person’s goods in this context does not mean the act of causing mistake or confusion as to the origin of the goods, but rather means the act of misleading another person’s goods as if they were the goods.

The case was returned to the instant case, and the instant case was examined.