The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 80 hours of community service) of the lower court is too unreasonable;

2. The judgment of the court below is only based on the facts that the defendant confessions all of the crimes of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim at the investigation stage. However, the crime of intimidation with a deadly weapon of this case is a dangerous glass of the defendant, and the nature of the crime is heavy, and the defendant has several records of punishment such as punishment for the same crime, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that can be considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, and considering the various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the age-oriented environment of the defendant, etc., the defendant's assertion is not acceptable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, Article 2(2) and (1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint intimidation and the choice of imprisonment) of the Act on Punishment of Violences, etc. shall be corrected to "Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint intimidation and the choice of imprisonment)" of the judgment below.