logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.10.24 2012고단1089
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant damaged property: (a) around 01:10 on July 21, 2012, at the D points of the victim C’s operation located in Seopopoposi B, the Defendant: (b) did not sell alcohol to the Defendant who left the single of the preceding single; and (c) took the Defendant out of the single of the single; and (d) took the Defendant out the door at closed; and (e) took the door of the unknown toilet on the door of the entrance.

2. The Defendant interfered with business by force, such as the date and time, place, etc. described in paragraph (1), the defect that the said victim is unable to enter the Defendant into the said danran bar, the defect that prevents the said victim from entering the said danran bar, the entrance door was set up in hand, and caused customers to leave the bar, thereby obstructing the said victim’s main business.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for a crime (a point of interference with business), and the selection of fines for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow