(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.11.20 2015구단13539

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.11.20 2015구단13539

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, a national of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh (hereinafter “the People’s Republic of Bangladesh”), entered the Republic of Korea on April 9, 1997, and was staying in the Republic of Korea on February 19, 200. The Plaintiff thereafter entered the Republic of Korea on February 4, 2009, and stayed in the Republic of Korea on February 4, 2009, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on November 27, 2013, prior to the expiration of the period of sojourn (E-9).

B. On June 11, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff does not constitute a case where there is a well-founded fear that the Plaintiff would be subject to persecution” as prescribed by Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion has been engaged in the Plaintiff’s activities by taking part in the tea loan, which is a student organization of Jamaat-Eslami (Jamaat-Eslami) and has engaged in the Plaintiff’s exercise of opposing Amig (AL), the Egypt Party of Bangladesh, while supporting the Egyptian Party.

The Plaintiff’s her birth was on the 7-day arrest of the police for the reason that the Plaintiff’s birth was on the part of the Plaintiff as a member of the Jinasia Party from around April 2001 to around 2013, and was on the 7-day arrest of the Plaintiff’s father. The Plaintiff’s father provided 10,000,000 won to the police for the seven-day arrest of the Plaintiff’s birth.

A. The members of A.I.D. ask the Plaintiff’s parents for the purpose of removing those who were party members of A.I.D. A.I.D., for the purpose of removing them.

In addition, Abagog party members, around August 2012, filed a false report as a land issue that does not exist with respect to the support recipients of Abagogs, including the Plaintiff, and around August 2013, including the Plaintiff.

유사 판례

-서울행정법원 2016.01.13 2015구단2850

-서울행정법원 2015.10.07 2015구단9936

-서울행정법원 2015.01.29 2014구합19476

-서울행정법원 2016.11.30 2016구단15259

-서울행정법원 2016.04.08 2015구단20490