1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 4, 2012, the Plaintiff completed medical treatment by no later than February 28, 2013 due to an accident that occurred in the course of the repair work for the Mandonese of Private Middle Schools, and filed a claim for disability benefits to the Defendant on October 13, 2015, after receiving the medical treatment until February 28, 2013, after receiving the judgment under class 9 subparagraph 15 of the disability grade. After receiving the additional medical care on January 14, 2015, the Plaintiff was receiving the non-neary transplantation surgery and the fluoral surgery, and received the medical treatment until May 30, 2015, and then claimed disability benefits to the Defendant on October 13, 2015.

B. On October 22, 2015, the Defendant determined the Plaintiff’s final disability grade as class 15 pursuant to the Plaintiff’s opinion that “Although there was no restriction on Plaintiff’s fingers movement, the Plaintiff’s last disability grade is determined as class 15 according to the remainder of the calendar less than 30% of the normal conditions in the field of the field of the fitness test (class 9 of the disability grade), and the other less than the sense of the part of the non-psychotropic anti-pathy (class

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

The Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for review and reexamination, but all of the appeals were dismissed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Uncontentious Facts, Gap evidence 4, Eul evidence 1 and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The part on the left-hand side of the Plaintiff’s assertion that the injury caused by the re-operation is worse, and the part on the left-hand side falls under class 7 subparag. 4 of the disability grade because it does not have a sense of sense and physical disorder, and the part on the left-hand part of the impergal cutting is serious pains over the central part of the cutting part as well as the efficiencing part of the cutting part, and it causes considerable hindrance to walking, and the part on the left-hand part of the impergal disorder is confirmed to a serious degree, and thus the Plaintiff’s final disability grade falls under class 6 of the disability grade applied mutatis mutandis.

Therefore, the defendant's disposition of this case on a different premise is unlawful.

B. 1 Medical Opinions) Plaintiff 1 Danean (Gneungsan Hospital) - Magneneneal damage part (In the left part: Magneungneney part): there is no sense of neutism and physical neutism function, and voluntary representation on the left part.