logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.08.31 2017나40133
매매대금반환 등
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the first instance against Defendant B and D shall be revoked.

2. The plaintiff's claims against the defendant B and D are all filed.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of the instant claim

A. On December 10, 2016, Defendant D, an employee of Defendant B’s assertion of the Plaintiff, introduced and caused only one of the Plaintiff to believe that he/she would buy the instant heavy vehicle, while she was able to purchase and sell the instant heavy vehicle for several hours on the same day. The Plaintiff purchased the instant heavy vehicle from Defendant C without properly verifying the status of the instant heavy vehicle, etc., and without obtaining only the performance register issued by Defendant Suwon Motor Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Company.

However, since the plaintiff was confirmed and seen later, the second class of the automobile was a able vehicle to be treated as a full-time loss due to a large accident around July 2016, and the defendant D and C conspired with the plaintiff to conceal the previous class of the second class of the automobile in this case, thereby deceiving the plaintiff, thereby deceiving the plaintiff. Thus, the defendant D is liable to compensate the plaintiff's damages pursuant to Article 58-3 of the Automobile Management Act or Article 750 of the Civil Act, and the defendant C is liable to compensate for the damages of the plaintiff pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act, and the defendant C is liable to compensate for the damages of the plaintiff by issuing a false or defective performance record of the second class of the automobile in this case by intentionally or by negligence, and therefore, the defendant D and C is liable to compensate the plaintiff's damages pursuant to Article 750 of the Civil Act, and the defendant B is the employer of the defendant D and C, and is liable to compensate the plaintiff's damages.

In addition, the damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to the said tort are KRW 32,700,00 for the used vehicle in this case, KRW 3,300,00 for the registration of the vehicle, KRW 300,00 for the motor vehicle, KRW 300,00 for the motor vehicle, KRW 30,00 for the drinking expenses at the time of shipping the vehicle, KRW 37,000 for the daily insurance premium, KRW 110,00 for the self-performance inspection expenses, KRW 16,440 for the delivery of the content certification to Defendant B, etc.

arrow